The Department of Justice (DOJ) denied the Motion for Reconsideration
(MR) filed by Manuel T. Ubarra Jr., the lawyer and spokesperson of the
Sobrepena-led Camp John Hay Development Corporation (CJHDevCo) on the
perjury charges filed against him by the Bases Conversion and
Development Authority (BCDA) before the DOJ.
“Respondent Ubarra, Jr. is a lawyer. It needs no reiteration that the
ethical standards applicable to a member of the bar, who thereby
automatically becomes a court officer, must necessarily be one higher
than that of the market place,” stated the five-page resolution dated 11
February 2014 penned by Prosecution Attorney Gail Stephanie C. Maderazo
and approved by Senior Deputy State Prosecutor Richard Anthony D.
Fadullon and Prosecutor General Claro A. Arellano.
BCDA president and CEO Arnel D. Casanova welcomed the resolution,
adding that the DOJ’s resolution is a “glaring indicator” that Manuel T.
Ubarra, Jr. has “zero credibility.”
“We laud the DOJ of its decision to deny the MR, it is indeed a legal
victory for the BCDA,” Casanova said adding that the case filed by
Ubarra, Jr. was a clear case of harassment.
It would be recalled that CJHDevCo spokesperson and lawyer Manuel T.
Ubarra, Jr. was arraigned by the Quezon City Metropolitan Trial Court
Branch 41 last 20 January 2014 for perjury. Ubarra’s arraignment came
after the court junked his lawyers’ motion to dismiss the perjury case.
The perjury case against Ubarra stemmed from the alleged deliberate
assertion of falsehood in a sworn statement given to the Office of the
Ombudsman.
BCDA president and CEO Casanova filed a complaint for perjury with
the DOJ, citing glaring falsehoods in the affidavit executed by Ubarra,
Jr. who is the vice president for litigation of the CJHDevCo, a lessee
of the BCDA-owned Camp John Hay, Baguio City which owes government
Php3.4 billon in rental arrears.
Casanova’s complaint stated that on July 4, 2012, Respondent Ubarra,
Jr. executed a Complaint-Affidavit before Atty. Marlyn T. Galvez,
Director of the Public Assistance Bureau of the Office of the Ombudsman
in Quezon City, falsely accusing Casanova that he did not promptly
respond to CJHDevoCo’s letter dated December 29, 2009; that it took
Casanova more than sixty (60) days to reply in a letter dated March 1,
2010.
“In making these statements, Respondent (Ubarra, Jr.) deliberately
asserted falsehoods under oath. I only became President and CEO of BCDA
when I took my oath of office on April 15, 2011,” Casanova’s complaint
read. The imputed acts took place more than a year before Casanova
became the BCDA president.
Casanova’s complaint emphasized that “Respondent’s (Ubarra, Jr.’s)
affidavit was required by law. The Rules of Procedure of the Office of
the Ombudsman, Administrative Order No. 7, require that complaints filed
before the Office of the Ombudsman should be under oath or, if not,
substantiated by the affidavit of the complainant or those of his
supporting witnesses.”
No comments:
Post a Comment